So I read a variety of things to keep a mildly balanced Information Diet. If I read something, I question it's validity regardless if I instinctively agree. I try to balance concepts, because "truth" can be all to the POV.
I wonder if people enjoy being miserable.
Masochists make lousy Christians when it comes to the "Golden Rule."
Found it odd that my Myers-Briggs letters match those attributed to Marquis de Sade and Bertrand Russell, but I find the whole list to be very oddly grouped.
Anyways, can someone be sued for libel when they attribute a quote on Twitter that is made up? Twitter is getting to be a place for haters.
Hash tags group like minded folks that can be swarmed by the thought police.
People who live alone shouldn't tweet, for they say dumb things without people around to correct their ignorance/stupidity regularly.
Can you image what Ted Kaczynski would have been like if he didn't get caught in 1996?
He'd tweet, I bet. But then again, he'd like to have more than 140 characters... but there's API for that.
Yes, he would have done such though he hated technology because he had a double standard that allowed him to use a typewriter. He'd terrorize people much like the SWAT-ters.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.